Features & Benefits of Monetical for Agile
Monetical for Agile Monetical Audits Discover more
Monetical for Agile enables project owners, ScrumMasters and stake holders to evaluate their own adoption of Agile against a pre-defined set of best practices.

At the end of each iteration or sprint, Monetical assess the results of the sprint against the goals set in the sprint planning meeting, focussing upon determining how well the sprint achieved the goals and objectives which had been set.

Project owners, ScrumMasters, stakeholders and customers can gain reassurance that the adoption and implementation of Agile development effectively delivers benefits. In particular, Monetical’s preconfigured intellect and unique analytical capabilities delivered through a series of self evaluation and optimisation audits help the Agile team to regularly evaluate, tune and adjust their behaviour to promote sustainable development and continuous improvement.

Overview

News & Comment

Monetical for Agile Explained

Features & Benefits

Request a Demo

Case Study

Cost Benefit Analysis

The key audits are:

Organisational Change Audits provide you with the data required to build a robust business case, set a number of high level operational and commercial targets to
I. determine whether adopting Agile is suitable for your organisation
II. Enable an accurate future assessment of the benefits from adopting Agile (i.e. determine whether original goals have been met and the customer satisfied).
Organisational Communication Audits assess whether the project team and the customer share a common vision and that this is reflected in the agreed backlog and the priorities placed on upon individual requirements.
Performance Assessment Audits help determine whether sprint reviews and retrospectives are meeting the needs of participants and promote the following of best practices.
Operational Management Audits evaluates the characteristics of the current adoption of an Agile development process and in particular whether it exploits best practices from published works and industry trends. E.g. duration of iterations or sprints, appropriate size and complexity of stories and how they are assigned and tracked.

The on-demand availability of integrated root cause analysis capabilities completed with preconfigured corrective measures becomes most effective when performance capability indicators fall below acceptable levels.